Blog

  • Erik Rubín presume romántico viaje a Londes al lado de su novia Geraldine Zárate; ella publica FOTOS en redes

    Erik Rubín presume romántico viaje a Londes al lado de su novia Geraldine Zárate; ella publica FOTOS en redes

    Un viaje envidiable fue el que presumió el cantante Erik Rubín, quien se encuentra felizmente enamorado al lado de su novia Geraldine Zárate. Ambos estuvieron en Londres, donde compartieron fotografías de los momentos románticos que vivió la pareja. ¡Acá te dejamos estos bellos momentos!

    Erik Rubín salió de viaje al lado de su pareja Geraldine Zárate.

    Erik Rubín salió de viaje al lado de su pareja Geraldine Zárate.

    /

    Foto: IG: @erikrubinoficial.

    Puedes leer: ¿Ángela Aguilar stalkea a Cazzu, ex de Nodal? Kunno reacciona a los rumores y dice: “Que sigan hablando”

    ¿Cuáles fueron las fotografías del viaje de Erik Rubín con su novia Geraldine Zárate?

    Geraldine Zárate, novia de Erik Rubín, compartió en sus historias de Instagram el viaje a Londres que hicieron, donde se les ve felizmente enamorados.

    Cerca del Big Ben y del Puente de la Torre fueron algunos de los lugares que ambos visitaron durante la noche y aprovecharon para tomarse fotografías en lo que sería uno de sus muchos viajes como pareja.

    Luego de que revelaron las fotografías los seguidores del cantante reaccionaran con comentarios positivos en redes sociales, al destacar lo enamorado que se encuentra Erik Rubín:

    • “¡Viaje de sueño! ¡Felicidades a la pareja!”.
    • “Muchas felicidades y buenos deseos a ambos”.
    • “¡Un viaje a Londres! ¿Qué más romántico puede haber?”.
    • “Suerte y por más momentos como este”.
    • “¡Qué envidiable! ¡Lucen tan bonitos juntos”.
    • “¿Dónde será la siguiente salidita como pareja? ¡Muchas felicidades a los dos “.

    Geraldine Zárate comparte fotografías del viaje de Londres al lado de su novio Erik Rubín.

    Geraldine Zárate comparte fotografías del viaje de Londres al lado de su novio Erik Rubín.

    /

    Foto: Instagam/@gerzo27.

    También puedes leer: Daniel Elbittar presume fotos que levantan suspiros y sube la temperatura: ¡El actor deja sin aliento!

    ¿Quién es Geraldine Zárate, novia de Erik Rubín?

    Geraldine Zárate, novia de Erik Rubín, está alejada de la vida pública del entretenimiento en comparación con el cantante. Actualmente ocupa el cargo de directora de innovación en el consorcio gastronómico Taquearte.

    La marca de comida cuenta con varias sucursales en la Ciudad de México y el Estado de México. Por lo tanto, Zárate ha desarrollado presencia en el sector restaurantero.

    Zárate labora en la gestión de diferentes proyectos de innovación y marketing, por lo que es la encargada de impulsar iniciativas que vinculan la gastronomía con la cultura y el arte mexicano.

    Geraldine Zárate es la novia actual de Erik Rubín.

    Geraldine Zárate es la novia actual de Erik Rubín.

    /

    Foto: Instagram/@gerzo27.

    Puedes leer: La casa de los famosos: Nueva participante entra al reality y es ¿expareja de un habitante? ¡Así se anunció!

    ¿Cuándo inició la relación de Erik Rubín y Geraldine Zárate?

    A finales de marzo de este 2026, a Erik Rubín se le vio con Geraldine Zárate, lo que comenzó a suponer una posible relación entre ambos sin que hasta ese momento confirmaran un noviazgo.

    Fue hasta mediados de abril cuando el cantante reveló que tenía una relación amorosa con Zárate, luego de que se dieran a conocer fotografías de ambos en un viaje a Guatemala.

    Erik Rubín confirmó un noviazgo con Geraldine Zárate a mediados de este mes de abril de 2026.

    Erik Rubín confirmó un noviazgo con Geraldine Zárate a mediados de este mes de abril de 2026.

    /

    Foto: Redes sociales.

  • NFL Network: Texans, LB Azeez Al-Shaair agree to terms on three-year, $54 million extension

    A 2019 undrafted free agent, Al-Shaair spent the first four seasons of his career mostly as a backup in San Francisco’s deep linebacker corps. He spent one year in Tennessee in 2023 before finding a home in Houston.

    The thumper, who at times can toe the line, is coming off his best season in Houston, generating 103 tackles, two interceptions and nine passes defended en route to his first career Pro Bowl nod.

    The extension ensures the middle of a nasty Houston defense remains intact beyond 2026.

  • Caos total en la Champions League: la violencia se tomó el Atlético de Madrid vs. Arsenal con brutal pelea entre hinchas y policías (video)



    Caos total en la Champions League: la violencia se tomó el Atlético de Madrid vs. Arsenal con brutal pelea entre hinchas y policías (video)












































    ¡Hola !, Tu correo ha sido verficado. Ahora puedes elegir los Boletines que quieras recibir con la mejor información.


    Bienvenido , has creado tu cuenta en EL TIEMPO. Conoce y personaliza tu perfil.


    Hola Clementine el correo baxulaft@gmai.com no ha sido verificado. Verificar Correo

    icon_alerta_verificacion

    El correo electrónico de verificación se enviará a

    Revisa tu bandeja de entrada y si no, en tu carpeta de correo no deseado.


    SI, ENVIAR


    Ya tienes una cuenta vinculada a EL TIEMPO, por favor inicia sesión con ella y no te pierdas de todos los beneficios que tenemos para tí. Iniciar sesión

    Información juicio Álvaro Uribe

    Destinos para viajar en Colombia

    Información de las Elecciones Colombia 2026

    Información del Mundial de futbol 2026

    Los desmanes se generaron después de que el bus del Atlético de Madrid pasó por el lado de los hinchas españoles. 

    Desmanes en Madrid Foto: EFE

    Alt thumbnail

    PERIODISTAActualizado:

    Atlético de Madrid y Arsenal se midieron este miércoles en la semifinal de ida de la Champions League en el estadio Metropolitano. El encuentro estuvo marcado por la violencia y los desmanes antes del pitazo inicial, tras la brutal pelea que se dio entre los hinchas del cuadro local y la policía.

    Había mucha adrenalina en el ambiente antes del partido. Miles de aficionados del Atlético de Madrid se volcaron a las calles de la capital española para hacerle un recibimiento impactante a sus jugadores, pero todo se tornó una pesadilla.

    Desmanes en Madrid Foto:EFE

    El bus del Atlético de Madrid pasó por la Avenida de Arcentales ante la euforia de su público, que tiró pirotecnia y utilizó bengalas para el momento. El caos se desató cuando la Policía Nacional intervino con cargas contra los aficionados rojiblancos que acudieron al recibimiento.

    El ambiente festivo pasó a ser un momento de terror entre las calles de Madrid. Cientos de aficionados, entre los que había mujeres y niños, tuvieron que correr para refugiarse por las cargas policiales que disuadieron a la masa que se aglutinó en la calle aledaña al estadio Metropolitano.

    Desmanes en Madrid Foto:EFE

    Otros aficionados del Atlético de Madrid decidieron enfrentar a la policía lanzando piedras y todo lo que se encontraron a su camino. Algunos agentes de la Policía fueron alcanzados por los objetos lanzados y la violencia fue escalando.

    La Policía intentó disuadir a los atacantes con gases lacrimógenos y, montados en sus caballos, los reprimieron para acabar con el caos que se tomó la previa de la semifinal de ida de la Champions League.

    Desmanes en Madrid Foto:EFE

    Video de los desmanes

    DEPORTES

    Sigue toda la información de Deportes en Facebook y Twitter, o en nuestra newsletter semanal.

    Alt thumbnail

    Regístrate en nuestros boletines y recibe noticias en tu correo según tus intereses. Mantente informado con lo que realmente te importa.

    Alt thumbnail

    Síguenos en GOOGLE NEWS. Mantente siempre actualizado con las últimas noticias coberturas historias y análisis directamente en Google News.

    Alt thumbnail

    Únete al canal de El Tiempo en WhatsApp para estar al día con las noticias más relevantes al momento.

    Alt thumbnail

    Mantente informado con la app de EL TIEMPO. Recibe las últimas noticias coberturas historias y análisis directamente en tu dispositivo.

    Alt thumbnail

    Información confiable para ti. Suscríbete a EL TIEMPO y consulta de forma ilimitada nuestros contenidos periodísticos.

    Imagen de seguimiento

  • Invitada a Venga la alegría deja plantados a conductores del programa y la exhiben EN VIVO: “No llegó” VIDEO

    Invitada a Venga la alegría deja plantados a conductores del programa y la exhiben EN VIVO: “No llegó” VIDEO

    Durante la transmisión en vivo de Venga la alegría del 28 de abril, los conductores del programa revelaron que una invitada, del día de hoy, los dejó “plantados”, motivo por el que tuvieron que modificar la dinámica del matutino. ¿Se molestaron?

    Venga la Alegría

    ¿Cómo anunciaron que una invitada a Venga la alegría no llegó al llamado?

    El hecho ocurrió durante la sección “Gánale al Capi”, una de las más populares del programa, cuando se dieron cuenta de la ausencia de la invitada.

    Según explicó Ricardo Casares, la producción había mantenido comunicación previa con la invitada, quien tenía un llamado pactado desde las 9:30 de la mañana. Sin embargo, con el paso de los minutos y ante su ausencia, se confirmó que no alcanzaría a llegar al foro.

    Estuvimos en comunicación con ella y el caso es que no llegó”, expresó Casares en plena transmisión. Te platicamos de quién se trata.

    Te puede interesar: Conductora despedida de ‘Venga la alegría’ fue presentada este viernes en ‘Hoy’: ¿Hubo traición?

    Ricardo Casares

    Ricardo Casares

    /

    Redes sociales

    ¿Quién es la invitada a Venga la alegría que no llegó al programa?

    Fue el propio conductor, Ricardo Casares, quien informó que la invitada especial, la DJ Shei (colaboradora del club Cruz Azul) no llegó a las instalaciones de TV Azteca, pese a que tenía programada su participación estelar en la sección:

    Teníamos como siempre una invitada, pensada, para que usted en casa se divierta, para que pueda esto salir de la mejor manera, lo habían anunciado, ella es la “DJ Shei”, la DJ del Cruz Azul. (…) El caso es que no llegó. Yo espero que no le vaya a hacer eso al Cruz Azul

    Ricardo Casares

    De manera casi inmediata, el conductor compartió un mensaje grabado por la propia DJ, quien se disculpó por su ausencia y culpó al tráfico de la CDMX como la causa del problema:

    Hey, amigos de Venga la alegría, ¿cómo están? Yo soy Shei, me apena muchísimo no poder llegar con ustedes el día de hoy, pero el tráfico de la ciudad está irreal. Espero verlos muy pronto ahí. ‘Capi’, nos vemos la próxima, dijo DJ Shei.

    Aunque la dinámica continuó sin su presencia, la molestia de Ricardo fue notable, ya que al finalizar la disculpa de la DJ, bromeó sobre su llamado, ya que la sección comenzó a las 12:30 y su llamado fue tres horas antes, lanzando un sarcástico comentario: “Llamado 9:30, 10:30, 11:30, 12:30, creo que viene de Acapulco. Una pena”, dijo Casares.

    No han habido más comentarios sobre este tema, y tampoco una nueva respuesta de la DJ en sus redes sociales.

    Lee: ¿Ricardo Casares será despedido de Venga la alegría? sería castigado por error de La granja VIP, aseguran


    ¿Quién es DJ Shei y qué contenido hace?

    Shei, es una DJ argentina que ha conseguido unir dos ámbitos que muchos consideran difíciles de mezclar: la música electrónica y el fútbol.

    En entrevista con el medio Estadio deportes, contó que su rol como responsable de animar el ambiente en el Estadio Ciudad de los Deportes durante los encuentros del Cruz Azul, la animó a crear una “experiencia única”.

    Fue entonces que un día decidió acercarse al equipo y así empezó su historia en el club: “Me acerqué al Azul porque ya había hecho algunos shows, y de alguna manera me hice viral en redes. Cuando me ofrecieron el show de medio tiempo, me sentí como si todo hubiera encajado”, finalizó.

    Su carrera como mezcladora y animadora ya es conocida y se ha ganado el afecto de los fans y seguidores del Cruz Azul.

    Tal vez te interese: Integrante de Venga la alegría tiene ¡error garrafal! Menciona a otro programa ¿de la competencia? VIDEO

    DJ Shei

    DJ Shei

    /

    IG: sheidjofficial

  • Hijo de Mariana Levy la recuerda a 21 años de su trágica muerte: “No me puedo ni levantar de la cama”

    Hijo de Mariana Levy la recuerda a 21 años de su trágica muerte: “No me puedo ni levantar de la cama”

    Hace 21 años, el mundo del espectáculo se vio conmocionado por la muerte de Mariana Levy, hija de la también fallecida Talina Fernández e icónica actriz. Tanto allegados como colegas no han dudado en recordarla con mucho cariño y nostalgia.

    Entre aquellos que expresaron su sentir en esta fecha tan dolorosa se encuentra José Emilio Levy, hijo de la celebridad. En una reciente entrevista, el joven abrió su corazón y manifestó el dolor que sigue sintiendo ante la pérdida de su mamá. Te contamos todo lo que dijo.

    José Emilio Levy

    José Emilio Levy

    /

    Redes sociales

    Lee: José Emilio Levy busca entrar a MasterChef México 2026 y pide apoyo: ¡Quiere su lugar en la cocina!

    ¿Cómo murió Mariana Levy, mamá de José Emilio Levy?

    La muerte de Mariana Levy se suscitó el 29 de abril de 2005. De acuerdo con informes oficiales, la actriz, su esposo ‘el Pirru’ y sus hijos iban rumbo a Six Flags México. Otro vehículo los comenzó a seguir.

    Una persona bajó del segundo coche y se les acercó para asaltarlos a punta de pistola. Ante esto, Mariana corrió hacia una patrulla para pedir ayuda, provocando que el criminal huyera de la escena. En algún punto, la también cantante le dijo a su pareja que estaba a punto de desmayarse.

    Los servicios de emergencia llegaron y la trasladaron al hospital más cercano. Desafortunadamente, no se pudo hacer nada por ella. La causa oficial de la muerte fue un infarto, aparentemente, derivado de un ataque de nervios.

    Tras las investigaciones correspondientes, la autoridad logró detener a cuatro individuos involucrados en el asalto. Los imputados reconocieron su culpabilidad y recibieron distintas sentencias.

    En cuanto a los restos de Mariana, estos fueron cremados. Las cenizas quedaron en resguardo de su mamá Talina Fernández hasta 2022, cuando la llamada ‘Dama del buen decir’ decidió esparcirlas en el Desierto de los Leones, en CDMX.

    Mariana Levy y Talina Fernández

    Mariana Levy y Talina Fernández

    /

    Liliana Carpio, Archivo TVNotas y redes sociales

    Te podría interesar: José Emilio Fernández Levy revela que fracasó reconciliación con ‘el Pirru’: ¡Quería… pero con condiciones!

    Esto dijo José Emilio Levy sobre la muerte de su mamá, Mariana Levy

    En entrevista para ‘Venga la alegría’, José Emilio Levy dijo seguir muy triste por la muerte de Mariana Levy. Aseguró que “odia abril”, ya que no solo se cumple un año más del deceso de su madre, sino que también es el mes en el que la actriz habría festejado su cumpleaños.

    “Ni me digas, que abril yo prefiero que no hubiera existido. Odio este mes. Son días en los que no me puedo ni parar de la cama ni hacer absolutamente nada. Estos días son horribles porque todo mundo me habla y me recuerda que mi mamá falleció. No es un día bonito. Yo prefiero apagar el teléfono y no saber de nadie”.

    José Emilio Levy

    Incluso admitió que no puede ver los proyectos en los que trabajó su mamá. Pese a esto, el joven sí homenajea a Mariana, tanto por su aniversario luctuoso como por su cumpleaños.

    Para mí, es muy difícil ver las novelas de mi mamá, no porque no las encuentre sino porque me rompo, me llena de sentimiento. No es porque no la quiera ver. No me he atrevido. Me hubiera gustado tener el recuerdo de cómo eran sus abrazos, sus besos, su voz”, manifestó.

    Cabe resaltar que la actriz perdió la vida tan solo unos meses después de haber dado a luz a José Emilio, por lo que el joven no tiene recuerdos de su mamá.


    ¿Quién es José Emilio Levy, hijo de Mariana Levy?

    • José Emilio Fernández Levy, hijo de Mariana Levy, es un actor y conductor mexicano.
    • Nació el 7 de julio de 2004, es decir, nueve meses antes de la muerte de su mamá.
    • También es hijo de José María Fernández ‘el Pirru’.
    • Estudio leyes, pero su sueño siempre ha sido seguir los pasos de su mamá.
    • Ha dado de qué hablar en los últimos años por las acusaciones de maltrato que ha hecho en contra de Ángel Muñoz, pareja de Ana Bárbara. La cantante fue su madrastra durante algunos años.
    • José Emilio también ha declarado abiertamente que no tiene una buena relación con su papá ‘el Pirru’.

    Mira: ¿José Emilio Fernández Levy se quita el apellido del ‘Pirru’? El hijo de Mariana Levy vuelve a la polémica

    José Emilio Levy

    José Emilio Levy

    /

    Redes sociales

  • The Athletic: Caleb Wilson could make this a Big 4 at the top in latest Mock Draft

    Despite missing the last month of the college season with hand injuries, UNC’s Caleb Wilson is No. 4 in the latest Mock Draft.

    Editor’s Note: Read more NBA coverage from The Athletic here. The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA or its teams. 

    ***

    2026 NBA Draft: Complete coverage

    As NBA teams have made clear through their tanking measures, scouts are very excited about the top end of this class. With Kansas’ Darryn Peterson, BYU’s AJ Dybantsa, Duke’s Cameron Boozer and North Carolina’s Caleb Wilson, at least four teams are going to walk away from the lottery with serious levels of excitement.

    Scouts are also excited about the guard group from No. 5 to No. 10, including Louisville’s Mikel Brown Jr., Arkansas’ Darius Acuff Jr., Illinois’ Keaton Wagler, Arizona’s Brayden Burries and Houston’s Kingston Flemings. From there, the draft starts to get complicated. From No. 10 or so down through No. 25-ish, there is very little consensus among scouts.

    The biggest discussion surrounding the depth involves the name, image and likeness (NIL) marketplace and transfer portal. How many players will risk being a late-first or early second-round pick when they have potentially $4 million waiting for them if they return to school? We already have a partial answer on that, as only 71 players decided to declare for the draft as early entrants, the lowest number in years. The reality is that many players decided to lock in their money now and stay in school, knowing that colleges might not keep their roster spot available through May. Now the question shifts to here: How many NBA teams will give first-round promises to prospects and their agents? Typically, promises are difficult to receive. But will more teams in the 30s look to try to promise surprising players to try to keep them in the class?

    Strategic draft considerations on both the player and team side are shifting under our feet. The finances in college have become so great that draft decisions are no longer as automatic as, “If you’re projected as a first-round pick, you should leave.” We’re set for what will be a wild game of chicken when it comes to prospects over the next month.

    A few other notes:

    • Every time I do one of these, I get asked where certain players are. If a freshman isn’t in the consensus top 35 based on the feedback I get from teams, I did not place them here. It would be a poor decision for such prospects to leave, given the three years of earning potential in college they would be passing up for an uncertain fate. Additionally, I’m going a bit off feel and intel that I’ve gathered at this point as to whether or not players are staying in the draft. The players I have not included here who have declared for the draft early include Tyler Tanner, Flory Bidunga, Billy Richmond III and Rueben Chinyelu, among others. My guess is that players like this will simply have better options available to them financially by returning to college in today’s ecosystem. If they decide to stay in the draft past the early-entry withdrawal date, I will mock them at that point.

    • Ages are as of draft night in 2026 (June 23).

    • Heights for college freshmen are what their schools list.

    • Draft order is based on standings at the end of the regular season, while also doing a spin of the lottery wheel provided by the good folks over at Tankathon. I did one spin, and this was the order it spat out.

    • Scouts were granted anonymity in exchange for speaking freely about prospects.


    FIRST ROUND

    1. Utah Jazz
    AJ Dybantsa | 6-9 wing | 19 years old | BYU

    Dybantsa is the name I get most at No. 1. He’s a dynamic, explosive scorer whose three-level scoring ability at 6 feet 9 shone brightly this season. Dybantsa averaged 25.5 points, 6.8 rebounds and 3.7 assists while shooting 51 percent from the field, 33.1 percent on 3-pointers and 77.4 percent from the free-throw line while getting there 8.5 times per game. He and Michael Beasley are the only two freshmen in college basketball history — stretching back to 1953-54, per Basketball-Reference — to average 25 points, shoot 50 percent from the field and take at least eight free-throw attempts per game.

    He plays with serious bend mixed with explosiveness, allowing him to consistently get into the teeth of the defense as a straight-line driver. In transition, he’s a menace. His midrange game has become a serious weapon. He’s also not a finished product. It’s clear where the improvement areas are for him. His jumper will get better as he ages. He improved drastically as a passer this season but has even more room for growth there when he plays next to more talented NBA players. And defensively, Dybantsa is not nearly as impactful as his measurements suggest he could become.

    Dybantsa is seen as having extremely high upside with a tremendously high floor. He’s a safer pick than Peterson. His offensive game is more well-rounded than Wilson’s. And scouts believe his athletic upside gives him a stronger chance to be a No. 1 option than Boozer.


    2. Washington Wizards
    Darryn Peterson | 6-5 guard | 19 years old | Kansas

    Peterson’s strange collegiate journey complicated his evaluation. He did play at least 28 minutes in each of his last nine games, and scouts aren’t all that worried about why he was only playing halves of games. Scouts connected with Kansas were always much less concerned about that than the media, as Peterson was dealing with legitimate injuries. NBA teams will also see Peterson’s medical testing at the draft combine, which should provide more answers.

    Peterson’s talent as a shot-making scorer is undeniable. He averaged 20.2 points while shooting 43.8 percent from the field, 38.2 percent from 3 and 82.6 percent from the line. He drilled an incredible number of difficult pull-up jumpers from all levels. However, his ability to get to the rim has come into question, as scouts wonder if life will be more difficult for him creating easy shots at the next level. Part of these issues at Kansas could have simply been because of his injuries; he looked less explosive than he was in high school. Another part could have been the Jayhawks’ lack of spacing. It was not dissimilar to what Anthony Edwards looked like at Georgia.


    3. Atlanta Hawks (via NOP)
    Cameron Boozer | 6-9 forward | 18 years old | Duke

    The Hawks move up in my lottery spin for this pick, acquired from the New Orleans Pelicans in last year’s draft-night trade.

    Boozer is the safest bet in the class to become a highly productive player. The consensus around the NBA that the son of Carlos Boozer will follow in his father’s footsteps as an All-Star. The consensus falls apart over whether he profiles as a No. 1 option.

    Boozer’s games in both the ACC and NCAA tournaments raised questions for scouts about building their team around him. In Duke’s seven postseason games, Boozer shot just 44 percent from the field and 32 percent from 3. He was remarkably productive, but his below-the-rim finishing ability was messy against players with legitimate NBA interior size such as Virginia’s Ugonna Onyenso.

    If Boozer were as tall as Nikola Jokić, this evaluation would be much easier. Jokić entered the league around 6-11 in shoes with a 7-3 wingspan; Boozer is expected to measure more in the 6-9 range with a 7-foot wingspan. He’s more the size of Kevin Love than Jokić, whose height and length allow him to use his special touch to get shots off from wild angles. Can Boozer consistently separate and draw help defenders in the NBA the same way he did in high school and college?

    Still, he averaged 22.5 points, 10 rebounds and four assists on his way to the national player of the year award, largely because of the myriad ways Duke proved that you can use him.


    4. Memphis Grizzlies
    Caleb Wilson | 6-10 wing | 19 years old | North Carolina

    Wilson missed the final month of the season with a broken right thumb and a broken left hand. Before that, he averaged 19.8 points, 9.4 rebounds, 2.7 assists, 1.5 steals and 1.4 blocks and was good in just about every game he played.

    It’s all about power and explosiveness for Wilson. He plays with terrific bend and balance as a driver. Combine that with his strength and leaping ability, and you get a special player who can dominate at the rim. The further into the cycle we get, the more I hear from scouts who see Wilson in the same group as Peterson, Dybantsa and Boozer, with some even ranking him as a top-three player in the class. It didn’t hurt Wilson’s case that he outperformed all three of those players when North Carolina played them this season (in Dybantsa’s case, in the preseason, but still).

    Wilson’s flaws are easier to scout than the others’, though. He doesn’t take many 3s (he was just 7-of-27 shooting on the season), although his mechanics looked good from the extended midrange area. Defensively, the block and steal numbers are strong, but he’s not as twitchy on the ball as you’d expect for an athlete of his caliber; plus, he’s messy off the ball with his rotations and with how quickly he reacts. Most of his assists come on pre-ordained reads within structure, rather than when he’s on the move and reacting. But the reality is that few players consistently play with his type of motor and aggressiveness. He has many similarities to Pascal Siakam, who has made multiple All-NBA teams.


    5. LA Clippers (via IND)
    Keaton Wagler | 6-6 wing | 19 years old | Illinois

    The Clippers received this pick from the Indiana Pacers in my spin after a creatively structured pick protection in the Ivica Zubac trade. LA gets this pick if it falls from No. 5 to No. 9.

    If the Clippers end up here, they would be in a tricky spot. Most of the players projected in this range are lead guards such as Acuff, Flemings, Wagler and Brown. However, the team already has its long-term lead guard signed to a large contract in Darius Garland.

    Wagler is probably the best fit with his size and ability to shoot off the catch. He is unequivocally this year’s biggest draft riser and maybe the biggest draft riser in the one-and-done era after leading Illinois to the Final Four.

    Wagler is not very quick-twitch with his first step, and he has very little vertical explosiveness. He’s also not all that strong. But he uses the threat of his pull-up jump shot better than any player in the class and plays with an incredibly rhythmic, well-paced tempo that makes it hard for opponents to stay in front of him.


    6. Brooklyn Nets
    Darius Acuff Jr. | 6-2 guard | 19 years old | Arkansas

    Acuff earned first-team All-America status by dominating games down the stretch. Over his final 13 games, he averaged an absurd 28 points per game and 6.7 assists while getting to the line 7.5 times per game. He was efficient and sharp, shooting 48 percent from the field and over 40 percent from 3.

    Acuff might be the most polished freshman guard prospect I’ve ever evaluated. His footwork and balance are pristine, and he tends to make efficient decisions. He plays off two feet and moves well without the ball to set up his on-ball moves. His passes are always crisp and on-target, even if his vision isn’t always elite.

    But can he consistently get paint touches against NBA length, and can he guard anybody? In terms of the former, he’s done just about everything in his power to make me a believer that he can separate, thanks to the threat of his shot and elite pace. But the latter is another story. Even though Acuff is stocky and strong, he’s easily the worst defender among the top 10 prospects. He struggles to get through screens and shows a lack of off-ball engagement too regularly.


    7. Sacramento Kings
    Kingston Flemings | 6-4 guard | 19 years old | Houston

    Flemings is a wildly explosive and powerful lead guard, using a lightning-quick first step to get by defenders with ease. Despite playing in an offense in which he had precious little space around him, he averaged 16.1 points and 5.2 assists while shooting 47.6 percent from the field and 38.7 percent from 3. You can see his burst every time he touches the court. He’s also an excellent decision-maker who improved defensively throughout the season.

    The main concerns revolve around his jumper consistency and the way that he scores. Flemings’ percentages dropped in Big 12 play. In his final 14 games, he shot just 41.3 percent from the field and got to the line only three times per game. Scouts wonder if he can consistently get to the rim. Houston’s rim pressure this season was among the worst in the country, and Flemings only averaged 51.2 percent at the rim in half-court settings, per Synergy. Was that a function of Flemings settling, or is it a flaw in his game? Flemings needs to improve his footwork on his gathers around the rim, but scouts should still be excited about how his speed and decision-making will translate to the next level, where he will get the kind of pace and space that will transform his game.


    8. Dallas Mavericks
    Brayden Burries | 6-4 guard | 20 years old | Arizona

    Burries was the leading scorer on one of the top three teams in the country, despite a slow start that saw him average just 7.8 points in his first five games. From that point, he averaged 17.3 points while shooting 51 percent from the field, 41 percent from 3 and 81 percent from the foul line in his final 34 games. He’s also an aggressive rebounder who grabbed 5.5 boards per game in that time, while averaging 2.4 assists as a solid ball mover who didn’t take many bad shots.

    The question is about separating from his man consistently, as he’s more of a power guard who uses the threat of his shot to keep defenders off-balance. Burries turned into a really good defender by the end of the year and averaged 1.5 steals. If Dallas plans to kickstart its rebuild around Cooper Flagg with Kyrie Irving as the point guard, Burries would be a great fit between them.


    9. Milwaukee Bucks
    Mikel Brown Jr. | 6-4 guard | 20 years old | Louisville

    Brown’s best flashes were those of a top-five pick. He dropped 45 points with 10 made 3s in a game against NC State, then followed it up with 29 points, six assists and three rebounds against Baylor and 29 points, five rebounds and four assists against SMU. When Brown had it rolling, there was not a more dynamic ball-screen playmaker in college basketball. He has range out to 30 feet, and his vision as a playmaker for others exceeds everyone in the class when playing in a screen. If anyone in this deep draft class could average nine or 10 assists per game in the NBA, it’s Brown.

    So why does he slip to No. 9? Some negative aspects of his game resemble the issues LaMelo Ball has, while he’s not quite as dynamic as Ball is in his best moments. First and foremost, Brown is extremely wild. The turnovers are an issue. He hasn’t figured out how to moderate his decision-making. Second, his defense is a work in progress. He’s a serious negative in switch situations against stronger players, and his off-ball instincts are hit or miss. Brown’s back injury recurred later in the season, too, causing him to miss the postseason. He got very little time off from the end of his high school season to the start of his college season, going from the all-star circuit directly into the under-19 World Cup and then into Louisville’s preseason. Scouts want to know if Brown’s back is merely a short-term issue from overuse or if it could be a long-term problem.


    10. Chicago Bulls
    Aday Mara | 7-3 big | 21 years old | Michigan

    Mara, by far, helped himself the most in the NCAA Tournament. I had a vote for Final Four Most Outstanding Player and chose Mara because of how he dominated the semifinal against Arizona (going off for 26 points, nine rebounds, three assists and two blocks) and how he completely changed the geometry defensively against Connecticut with his ability to guard Tarris Reed Jr. on an island while also shutting down the interior for drivers.

    Three years into his college career, Aday Mara has rediscovered his joy — and emerged as one of the nation’s best defenders.
    Mara combines two skills NBA teams seek in their centers: the ability to shut down the paint and the ability to read the court out high as a passer. Opponents shot 54.5 percent at the rim this season when Mara was on the court compared to better than 60 percent when he was off it, per CBB Analytics. Opposing teams also shot just 36 percent on 2-pointers from the paint when Mara was on the court. On offense, Mara is terrific at using his height and feel for the game to dissect what is happening and make the right passing reads, be it a simple handoff or a more complex reaction to find a cutter at the rim. He dished out 2.4 assists per game and shot 66.8 percent from the field. Mara’s hands can be an issue with bobbles and turnovers, and his lateral foot speed is concerning. But the Bulls desperately need a defensive anchor.


    11. Golden State Warriors
    Yaxel Lendeborg | 6-9 big | 23 years old | Michigan

    Even though Lendeborg gutted through an ankle injury in the Final Four, he led Michigan to a title and transformed his game. His counting numbers were down from his heights at UAB, but he averaged 15.1 points, 6.8 rebounds and 3.2 assists while playing aggressive defense. He showcased serious switchability, often picking up lead ballhandlers at the point of attack as well as playing against power forwards when Mara or Morez Johnson Jr. would leave the court. He’s also an active help defender with excellent hands.

    He drilled 37.4 percent of his 3s for the season, thanks to a hot streak at the end of the year in which he made 48.1 percent over his final 16 games — and that includes a 0-of-5 mark when he was clearly hobbled against UConn in the title game. The Warriors could use another big wing next to Stephen Curry and Draymond Green as they near the end of their careers.


    12. Oklahoma City Thunder (via LAC)
    Nate Ament | 6-10 wing/forward | 19 years old | Tennessee

    Ament’s season was a true roller coaster, and his draft stock is a bit funky as a result. He averaged 14.7 points, 6.5 rebounds and 2.6 assists per game in his first 15 games but was only shooting 40 percent from the field and 27 percent from 3. Those numbers were also buoyed by big games against bad teams, like his 23 points against Northern Kentucky, his 19 against Rice and North Florida and his 20 against Rutgers. Then, over 12 games before he sprained an ankle in Tennessee’s game against Alabama, few players were better in high-major conference play. He averaged 22 points, 6.8 rebounds and 2.5 assists while shooting 44 percent from the field, 38 percent from 3 and 84 percent from the line while getting there a ridiculous nine times per game in that run. But when he returned for postseason play, he clearly wasn’t 100 percent. He averaged just 13.3 points while shooting 31.3 percent from the field, including 28.6 percent from inside the arc as he had zero lift.

    Still, that issue with his scoring inside the arc showcases problems with his game. He’s still quite skinny, and scouts aren’t sure how his frame will fill out. He added a lot of good weight in the offseason leading into his freshman year, which allowed him to at least deal with the rigors of college basketball. However, he doesn’t have a ton of athletic explosiveness. His finishing at the rim has been concerning when he doesn’t get fouled, as he made a ridiculously low 42 percent of his shots at the rim at 6-10, per Synergy.

    The 6-foot-10 sharpshooter struggled early in his freshman season but has recently shown what all the preseason top-5 buzz was about. Teams that I’ve spoken with are divided on Ament. Some scouts see him as an option in the top eight, while others see him outside the top 20 because of his lack of strength and explosiveness.


    13. Miami Heat
    Labaron Philon Jr. | 6-3 guard | 20 years old | Alabama

    Philon returned to school at the last minute last May, and he took advantage of his extra year. He stepped into Alabama’s lead guard role and averaged 22 points, 3.5 rebounds and five assists per game while shooting 50 percent from the field, 39 percent from 3 and 80 percent from the foul line. Though his defense took a step back from last season, when he was terrific while playing next to Mark Sears and only sharing the on-ball responsibilities, he was one of the best offensive players in the country.

    So why is he not higher? First, this class is loaded with truly elite point guards like Brown, Acuff and Wagler. Second, teams worry about his frame and that he seemingly has not put on much mass this year after returning to school. Third, Alabama’s scheme is clearly favorable to him and gives him the space and time he desires to operate, both in half-court and transition settings.


    14. Charlotte Hornets
    Hannes Steinbach | 6-11 big | 20 years old | Washington

    Steinbach is the next center on the board whom scouts feel strongest about. The best rebounder in the draft, Steinbach has massive hands that he uses to his utmost potential both in ball screens and on the glass. He averaged 11.8 rebounds per game this year, including a monstrous 4.2 offensive rebounds per game that would fit incredibly well with what the Hornets are building scheme-wise under Charles Lee, as they care immensely about the possession battle. Steinbach also moves very fluidly and has huge, broad shoulders that he uses well in screens and also has strong timing as a roller.

    He averaged 18.5 points this year for Washington, a team that had horrendous point guard play and even less spacing around him, as they shot just 31.5 percent from 3. And yet still, Steinbach shot 62 percent from 2-point range and 58 percent from the field. He also showcases potential as a shooter, having made 34 percent of his two 3-point attempts per game. Defensively, Steinbach doesn’t move well laterally in space, and I didn’t think he was an overly impactful rim protector. His range seems to be in the N0. 10 to No. 20 part of the draft.


    15. Chicago Bulls (via POR)
    Cameron Carr | 6-6 guard | 21 years old | Baylor

    Carr had a nuclear hot start to the season and then largely settled in as one of the best high-major scorers in the country. He averaged 18.9 points per game while shooting 49.4 percent from the field, 37.4 percent from 3 and 80.1 percent from the foul line. Carr is a terrific shooter with great straight-line slashing instincts, using his long strides and length to cover ground quickly before getting to the rim.

    It’s very difficult to find players who are in the ballpark of 6-6 with incredibly long arms like Carr’s who can shoot. His lack of physicality and his high waist show up defensively, as he still doesn’t impact the game unless he’s rotating across for a weakside contest. Carr needs to keep putting on weight and getting stronger and also has to work on playing with more bend and accessing leverage better.


    16. Memphis Grizzlies (via PHX)
    Koa Peat | 6-8 wing | 19 years old | Arizona

    Peat prompts a wide range of opinions from NBA scouts. On the plus side, he has won everywhere he’s been and is one of the most decorated players in his age group. He won state titles and four gold medals with Team USA in youth events, then helped carry Arizona to a Final Four. He averaged 14.1 points while shooting 53 percent from the field and is a tough, physical rebounder. He passes well and makes excellent decisions to keep his team in the flow of the offense, be it in short rolls out of ball screens or on the wing. If you need him to score, he can do that as we saw in the NCAA Tournament, where he averaged 17.2 points and 7.6 rebounds while shooting 48.5 percent from the field and taking a bigger offensive load. Or, he can slide into a role as a tough, physical defender who takes on different matchups and then makes quick reads.

    Yet, the flaws jump off the page. He’s not really a shooter, as he’s only taken 20 3-point attempts and made seven of them while hitting just 62.3 percent of his attempts at the foul line — basically in line with his averages at lower levels. Defensively, he’s not overly fast, and there are possessions when you see him get beaten laterally by quicker players, although I did think he was a good defender by the end of the season. Ultimately, it’s going to take a team that really values his winning attributes, which the Grizzlies would as they look to build out their core around Cedric Coward, Zach Edey and others.


    17. Oklahoma City Thunder (via PHI)
    Morez Johnson Jr. | 6-9 big | 20 years old | Michigan

    Johnson was one of my favorite players in college basketball. He was one of the most efficient players in the country, averaging 13.1 points per game while shooting 62.3 percent from the field. He got to the foul line four times per game and made 78 percent of those. He’s a tough rebounder who is physical on the interior and crashes with his long arms. But I love Johnson the most on defense; he was the best all-around defender on one of the three best defenses in the nation, and that included Lendeborg and Mara. He’s tremendous as a post defender, flying around in help and showcasing switchability on the perimeter.

    But Johnson is undersized for his role despite his strength and doesn’t have a ton of offensive versatility. Essentially, he’s a play finisher around the interior. That skill set is reminiscent of Isaiah Stewart, and Stewart has turned into a very valuable player for the Pistons. Oklahoma City has been linked to Stewart before, and even though the Thunder took Thomas Sorber last season, they’re loaded everywhere and can afford to take another big. Teams across the league look at Oklahoma City, as well, as a team primed to likely try to combine its picks to move up or to try to move one of these picks to move out of the draft.


    18. Charlotte Hornets (via PHX)
    Christian Anderson Jr. | 6-2 guard | 20 years old | Texas Tech

    If you made me choose the best shooter in this class, it would be Anderson. He hit 41.5 percent of his eight 3-point attempts per game and is an absurd shot maker at the point guard position. He can make them going to his right or to his left, hits them off the catch after movement or off pull-ups by creating space. He’s also a terrific passer out of ball screens, averaging 7.4 assists per game.

    The two big questions are simple. First, can Anderson generate consistent paint touches and get to the rim? It was hit or miss in that respect, particularly in Big 12 play. He averaged just five attempts per game inside of 2-point range because of his lack of size and strength. That size question is also an issue on defense, where Anderson is a willing worker and fights for position but isn’t strong enough yet to hold up at the point of attack through his core and lower half. Even with the in-season acquisition of Coby White, the Hornets could use a bit more cover at the backup at the lead guard spot behind LaMelo Ball.


    19. Toronto Raptors
    Chris Cenac Jr. | 6-10 big | 19 years old | Houston

    Cenac is another polarizing prospect. Some view him as a potential lottery pick, while others think he should do another year at Houston. One of the most highly touted prospects in the 2025 recruiting class, Cenac is a flexible athlete who moves well on the perimeter and has a burgeoning offensive game on the outside to match. He played a lot of minutes at power forward for Houston, often sitting in the corners or cutting baseline to space the court. He’s become an awesome rebounder, averaging eight per game in 25 minutes per night.

    Cenac took under 1.5 attempts per game at the rim in half-court settings this year, a paltry number. He was extremely perimeter-oriented and settled far too often. He took 141 jump shots versus 47 attempts at the rim. You can certainly blame Houston’s scheme some, but he also struggled to get into those areas because of his lack of force and vertical pop. His defensive efforts were also mixed. He had positive moments with his mobility and weakside rotational ability to cover ground, but he also had several moments when he was slow to react and didn’t make the right rotations. I really like the idea of him paired with Collin Murray-Boyles long-term in the frontcourt, along with all of Toronto’s length and athleticism around him.


    20. San Antonio Spurs (via ATL)
    Karim Lopez | 6-8 wing | 19 years old | New Zealand Breakers

    Lopez’s numbers look in line with past lottery picks coming out of Australia’s NBL Next Stars program, as he’s averaging 12 points, six rebounds, two assists, a steal and a block per game. He has excellent hands, is very skilled with the ball and often operates as essentially a mismatch hybrid forward for the Breakers. He’s a physical bowling ball who can play in screens and short rolls. He can attack in a straight line from the perimeter, and he is a solid finisher.

    The 3-point shooting has been up and down in his two years in New Zealand (32 percent), but he looks to have good touch and should work through any concerns there. The bigger questions come on defense, as his lateral speed isn’t particularly good. He doesn’t have much shake on the ball offensively; on defense, his hips don’t flip quickly enough, and he can be beaten by faster guards. If he improves in those two areas as he ages, he’ll be an excellent rotation player.


    21. Detroit Pistons (via MIN)
    Dailyn Swain | 6-8 wing | 20 years old | Texas

    How about this for the Pistons, moving up from pick No. 28 to No. 21 in the Jaden Ivey deal, the best possible selection they could have received in what was a top-20 protected pick swap for a player whom the Bulls waived? The difference in value from No. 28 to No. 21 is pretty close to a late first-round pick in value, especially in this class and in the NIL era.

    Swain helped himself a lot by following his former Xavier coach, Sean Miller, to Texas. The slashing wing moved into more of a primary role and thrived, averaging 17.3 points, 7.5 rebounds and 3.6 assists per game while shooting 54.2 percent from the field and driving his way into more than five free-throw attempts per game. His style is very reminiscent of another former Xavier wing, Naji Marshall, as he is an aggressive downhill player who should have zero issue pressuring the rim, even in the NBA, but who also needs to improve as a shooter to maximize that ability. Swain also has far better overall explosiveness, and his body mechanics allow him to get into tighter areas of the court with ease.

    Swain’s shot is elongated with a slow release, meaning that opposing players can close out on him with little issue and force contested shots. While he clearly has touch and has made 80 percent of his free throws in his career, he hasn’t made shots consistently. While Swain is a ballhawk on defense who averaged 1.5 steals for his career, he’s a riverboat gambler who often misses help rotations, and he’s often a negative on the defensive end.


    22. Atlanta Hawks (via CLE)
    Ebuka Okorie | 6-2 guard | 19 years old | Stanford

    The Hawks moved Trae Young at the trade deadline, so let’s get them a potential replacement who ticks several boxes for them. This one might make me look silly in a month, as Okorie is clearly just testing his draft stock and might end up as a 2027 draft pick. Still, I’m a buyer on Okorie’s ability with the ball in his hands. He’s constantly in attack mode, averaging 23.2 points per game as a freshman while shooting solid clips of 46.5 percent from the field, 35.4 percent from 3 and 83.2 percent from the line. He’s lightning quick, with the ability to zoom in and out of tight windows in the paint. He drives an immense amount of shots at the rim thanks to that ability to slink through the little cracks in the defense.

    So why isn’t he higher? Well, he only made 52 percent of those shots at the rim in half-court settings, per Synergy, meaning he wasn’t wildly effective when he got there. He also averaged 7.3 free-throw attempts per game to make himself efficient. While he shot that solid mark from 3, teams want to see more of him as a shooter. Still, I’m betting Okorie has an impressive pre-draft process, if only because it’s hard to imagine a player more well-suited to three-on-three workouts like the ones that NBA teams employ.


    23. Philadelphia 76ers (via HOU)
    Jayden Quaintance | 6-10 big | 18 years old | Kentucky

    Quaintance only played in four games this year, as he attempted to return early from a torn ACL he suffered late last season. He looked like a potential defensive anchor for a Kentucky team that desperately needed one on the interior and played really well in the team’s win over St. John’s in his first game back. His mobility and defensive instincts jumped off the page when he was a 17-year-old at Arizona State and made the Big 12 All-Defensive team while averaging 1.1 steals and 2.6 blocks per game.

    Projecting Quaintance is a fool’s errand until we get answers at the combine on his medicals and whether he can make a full comeback by the time the NBA season starts. If he were fully healthy this year, I think he’d be the 10th pick in this class, as he reminds me a lot of Robert Williams III, who made an All-Defensive team for the Boston Celtics. But the range is extremely wide for Quaintance. For the 76ers, he ticks a lot of the boxes that they tend to value in terms of youth versus production, even with the injury history.


    24. Los Angeles Lakers
    Amari Allen | 6-8 wing | 20 years old | Alabama

    Allen is a terrific Swiss Army knife wing who excites scouts, even though it might make more sense for him to return to school. He averaged 11.4 points, 6.9 rebounds, 3.1 assists, one steal and nearly one block per game while shooting 44 percent from the field, 34 percent from 3 and 74 percent from the foul line. Like a younger Josh Hart, he does a little bit of everything without truly excelling in an area outside of rebounding. But NBA teams are always looking for wings who can dribble, pass and shoot while providing at least solid size on the defensive end.


    25. New York Knicks
    Tarris Reed Jr. | 6-11 big | 22 years old | Connecticut

    Outside of Mara, no one helped themselves more in the NCAA Tournament than Reed, whose ability to dominate the glass and score on the interior was terrific. He averaged nearly 20 points and 13 rebounds in NCAA Tournament play while leading the Huskies to the national championship game.

    Reed is a rugged rebounder on the interior and a real physical presence at 260 pounds, but more than that, he’s also versatile in ball-screen coverages defensively because he moves his feet better than you expect from someone this size. With something in the ballpark of a 7-4 wingspan, expect Reed to win the measurement game, and he will have the ability to likely perform well at the draft combine by getting second-chance opportunities and buckets.

    Mitchell Robinson is a free agent at the end of the season for the Knicks, so it would make sense for the organization to look at a strong contender for that backup center role behind Karl-Anthony Towns who provides toughness in the middle. He’d also fit the team’s desire to crash the offensive glass hard.


    26. Denver Nuggets
    Bennett Stirtz | 6-4 guard | 22 years old | Iowa

    After a slow start, Stirtz dominated while leading Iowa to the Elite Eight. In his final 25 games, he averaged 21.5 points, 4.1 assists and made 47.2 percent of his shots from the field and 33.5 percent of his eight 3-point attempts per game and 87.2 percent of his shots from the line. With his pace and skill, he was a dynamite scorer with elite-level basketball IQ for a team that wasn’t that talented by Big Ten standards. The Hawkeyes also played at one of the slowest paces in college basketball under coach Ben McCollum, making these numbers all the more impressive.

    There are some concerns about whether Stirtz can consistently get to the rim in the NBA and whether he can guard at a high-enough level. But teams always want guards who are elite shooters and who can dribble and pass, plus have a tremendous feel for the game. Minnesota, particularly, could use a point guard who gets the team in and out of its sets next to Anthony Edwards.


    27. Boston Celtics
    Henri Veesaar | 7-0 center | 22 years old | North Carolina

    Veesaar is projecting like he prefers to stay in the 2026 draft, and he’d be a pretty excellent fit as a complement for Neemias Queta with the Celtics. At 7-foot, Veesaar moves very well for his size and also has a high-end skill set that involves both passing (as he averaged 2.1 assists per game) and shooting from distance, as he hit 42.6 percent of his three 3-point attempts per game. For a Celtics organization that really values shooting from the center position — especially as a counter to Queta — Veesaar would tick a lot of boxes as a strong developmental big man who could play minutes as soon as he gets a bit stronger and tougher on the interior.


    28. Minnesota Timberwolves (via DET)
    Isaiah Evans | 6-6 wing | 20 years old | Duke

    Evans had a strong close to the season up until his final game, helping Duke reach the Elite Eight. He averaged 15 points per game while shooting 43 percent from the field and 35 percent from 3, but over his final 15 games, he averaged 16.5 points while shooting 46.7 percent from the field and 39.7 percent from 3 on over eight 3-point attempts per game. Evans is a dynamic shooter off movement who worked really well with Boozer both in ball screens and as a screener, then also ran off many off-ball screens himself.

    Evans expanded his game in a big way this year as a driver, too, going from taking 81 percent of his shots from 3 as a freshman to 65 percent of his shots from 3 while taking four attempts inside the line per game. He also got a bit more physically stronger on defense, although he still has some room to grow.


    29. Cleveland Cavaliers (via SAS)
    Meleek Thomas | 6-5 wing | 19 years old | Arkansas

    Thomas is a dynamic offensive weapon and was a strong running mate for Acuff at Arkansas. As a freshman, he averaged 15.6 points and 2.5 assists while shooting over 41 percent from 3, a strong mark that showcases his ability to make shots both off movement and off pull-up situations. He has every bit of the look of a strong sixth-man/microwave scorer in the NBA. The issues here are mostly centered around decision-making and his defensive play. Thomas had a penchant for taking wild shots a bit too often, especially from the midrange and at the rim, instead of passing. Beyond that, he struggled with his anticipation and timeliness on defense and wasn’t always in the right position, even if he did show some ability on the ball. He needs to get stronger and learn how to guard, but there is some real upside for someone to get the most out of Thomas.


    30. Dallas Mavericks (via OKC)
    Tounde Yessoufou | 6-5 wing | 20 years old | Baylor

    From a scoring perspective, Yessoufou was one of the most productive freshmen in the country. He averaged 17.8 points per game while grabbing 5.9 rebounds per night. He’s all sorts of physical and plays with an insatiable motor that never seems to stop running, and he averaged two steals per game as a physical point-of-attack defender who jumped passing lanes well.

    Teams, however, are concerned about his style of play and how it will translate. Yessoufou is largely a power-based player and has gotten a lot of recent points through mismatches against smaller players, posting them or attacking out of the midpost. That’s not a style that works in the NBA. Additionally, while Yessoufou sports a remarkably high steal rate, his overall defensive quickness and awareness are not that strong. He regularly gets beat off the bounce by quicker players. Still, there’s some excitement about his game from scouts, purely because he’s been consistently productive at every level.


    SECOND ROUND

    31. New York Knicks (via WAS): Alex Karaban | 6-7 wing | 23 years old | Connecticut

    32. Memphis Grizzlies (via IND): Allen Graves | 6-8 forward | 19 years old | Santa Clara

    33. Brooklyn Nets: Joshua Jefferson | 6-9 wing | 22 years old | Iowa State

    34. Sacramento Kings: Juke Harris | 6-7 wing | 20 years old | Wake Forest

    35. San Antonio Spurs (via UTA): Zuby Ejiofor | 6-9 big | 22 years old | St. John’s

    36. Oklahoma City Thunder (via DAL): Sergio De Larrea | 6-5 wing | 20 years old | Valencia

    37. LA Clippers (via MEM): Luigi Suigo | 7-3 center | 19 years old | Mega

    38. Chicago Bulls (via NOP): Ryan Conwell | 6-4 guard | 22 years old | Louisville

    39. Houston Rockets (via CHI): Braden Smith | 6-0 guard | 22 years old | Purdue

    40. Boston Celtics (via MIL): Maliq Brown | 6-8 big | 22 years old | Duke

    41. Miami Heat (via GSW): Alexandros Samodurov | 6-11 center | 21 years old | Panathinaikos

    42. San Antonio Spurs (via POR): Richie Saunders | 6-5 wing | 24 years old | BYU

    43. Brooklyn Nets (via LAC): Ugonna Onyenso | 6-11 big | 22 years old | Virginia

    44. San Antonio Spurs (via MIA): Baba Miller | 6-11 wing | 22 years old | Cincinnati

    45. Sacramento Kings (via CHA): Emanuel Sharp | 6-3 guard | 22 years old | Houston

    46. Phoenix Suns (via PHI): Jaden Bradley | 6-3 guard | 22 years old | Arizona

    47. Dallas Mavericks (via PHX): Trevon Brazile | 6-9 big | 23 years old | Arkansas

    48. Orlando Magic: Ja’Kobi Gillespie | 6-1 guard | 22 years old | Tennessee

    49. Toronto Raptors: Bruce Thornton | 6-2 guard | 22 years old | Ohio State

    50. Denver Nuggets (via ATL): Tyler Bilodeau | 6-8 forward | 22 years old | UCLA

    51. Washington Wizards (via MIN): Tamin Lipsey | 6-1 guard | 22 years old | Iowa State

    52. Houston Rockets: Tyler Nickel | 6-7 wing | 22 years old | Vanderbilt

    53. LA Clippers (via CLE): Duke Miles | 6-1 guard | 24 years old | Vanderbilt

    54. Golden State Warriors (via LAL): Nick Martinelli | 6-6 wing | 22 years old | Northwestern

    55. Chicago Bulls (via DEN): Izaiyah Nelson | 6-10 big | 22 years old | South Florida

    56. New York Knicks: Otega Oweh | 6-5 guard | 23 years old | Kentucky

    57. Atlanta Hawks (via BOS): Jaden Henley | 6-6 wing | 22 years old | Grand Canyon

    58. New Orleans Pelicans (via DET): Felix Okpara | 6-10 big | 22 years old | Tennessee

    59. Minnesota Timberwolves (via SAS): Trey Kaufman-Renn | 6-9 forward | 23 years old | Purdue

    60. Washington Wizards (via OKC): Kashie Natt | 6-3 guard | 23 years old | Sam Houston State

    ***

    Sam Vecenie covers the NBA Draft, college basketball and the NBA for The Athletic. His podcast, the Game Theory Podcast, is regularly ranked among the top podcasts on iTunes. Previously, he worked for CBS Sports, SB Nation, Sporting News, and Vice. Follow Sam on Twitter @Sam_Vecenie

  • Panamá fortalece la inmunización regional con el lanzamiento de la Semana de la Vacunación en las Américas 2026

    Panamá fortalece la inmunización regional con el lanzamiento de la Semana de la Vacunación en las Américas 2026

    Panamá fortalece la inmunización regional con el lanzamiento de la Semana de la Vacunación en las Américas 2026 

    Panamá, 29 de abril de 2026 — Con el firme compromiso de proteger la salud de toda la población, La Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) en Panamá junto al Ministerio de Salud (MINSA), celebraron este 28 de abril, la 24.ª Semana de la Vacunación en las Américas (SVA) y la 15.ª Semana Mundial de la Inmunización (SMI) con el llamado a la acción: “Tu decisión marca la diferencia. Inmunización para todos.” Del 25 de abril al 2 de mayo, la región se une para cerrar brechas de inmunización. 

    A nivel nacional, el Ministerio de Salud (MINSA) de Panamá intensificará estas acciones del 23 al 30 de abril. Esta iniciativa busca fortalecer la conciencia sobre la vulnerabilidad de la Región de las Américas ante brotes de enfermedades prevenibles por vacunación (EPV). La SVA es reconocida como un bien público regional que ha beneficiado a más de mil millones de personas. 

    El objetivo principal es acelerar el cierre de brechas urgentes, con especial énfasis en la prevención del sarampión. En un contexto de alta movilidad poblacional asociado a eventos masivos como la Copa Mundial de Fútbol, mantener la inmunización como prioridad en la agenda política es vital para garantizar la seguridad sanitaria tanto a nivel nacional como regional. 

    Fotografía de la representante de la OPS/OMS en Panamá en discurso de apertura durante el lanzamiento de la SVA26.

    Dra. Ana Rivière Cinnamond, representante de la OPS/OMS en Panamá destacó la importancia del compromiso de alto nivel: “La vacunación es una herramienta estratégica para la recuperación de la inmunización sistemática. Durante más de dos décadas, esta Semana ha demostrado que cuando los países se unen por la salud, los resultados trascienden fronteras. Ha permitido llevar vacunas a millones de personas, cerrar brechas históricas y proteger generaciones enteras”. 

    Por su parte, el ministro de Salud de Panamá, Dr. Fernando Boyd Galindo señaló que el objetivo es aumentar la cobertura de vacunación, fortaleciendo el Programa Ampliado de Inmunizaciones (PAI) y el primer nivel de atención. Durante esta semana se ha priorizado la aplicación de las 25 vacunas del esquema nacional, especialmente en grupos de riesgo, y se ha llegado a áreas comarcales, de difícil acceso y poblaciones migrantes. 

    Una gran acogida por parte de la población se ha demostrado con la aplicación de 131,774 dosis del esquema nacional de vacunación desde el 23 de abril hasta la fecha, según informó Itzel de Hewitt, coordinadora del PAI. 

    La OPS brinda cooperación técnica y acompañamiento permanente para el fortalecimiento de las actividades relacionadas con enfermedades prevenibles por la vacunación. Este apoyo incluye el fortalecimiento de las actividades del programa ampliado en inmunización, vigilancia epidemiológica, los sistemas de laboratorio y participación comunitaria con una mirada intercultural. 

    En Panamá, este enfoque se traduce en acciones concretas en territorios de difícil acceso, incluyendo comunidades indígenas, donde se promueve una comunicación adaptada a la diversidad cultural y lingüística. A través de estas intervenciones, se busca combatir la desinformación, fortalecer la confianza en las vacunas y garantizar que nadie quede atrás.  

    Estas alianzas entre el MINSA, la OPS, con organismos internacionales y actores locales son fundamentales para mantener los logros alcanzados en salud pública. 

    Finalmente, la organización enfatiza la importancia del monitoreo y la documentación de las dosis administradas para asegurar la transparencia y toma de decisiones. Proteger la salud colectiva es una tarea conjunta donde cada dosis aplicada cuenta. La SVA 2026 representa una oportunidad clave para demostrar que, con voluntad política y participación comunitaria es posible avanzar hacia un futuro libre de brotes. 

  • OPS advierte sobre brechas críticas en el mercado laboral de la salud en nueve países de América del Sur

    OPS advierte sobre brechas críticas en el mercado laboral de la salud en nueve países de América del Sur

    La disponibilidad del personal sanitario oscila entre menos de 40 y cerca de 118 profesionales por cada 10.000 habitantes en la región. La OPS llama a fortalecer la formación, la retención y las condiciones laborales.

    Washington, 29 de abril 2026 (OPS) – La Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) advirtió hoy que persisten desigualdades críticas en la disponibilidad y distribución del personal de salud en Sudamérica, con una marcada concentración en capitales y grandes ciudades y escasez en zonas rurales y desatendidas, según un nuevo informe regional.

    El informe, Panorama del mercado laboral de la salud en nueve países de América del Sur, analiza la situación en Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Perú y Uruguay, y ofrece por primera vez un panorama comparativo de las principales desigualdades que afectan el funcionamiento de los sistemas de salud en la subregión.

    Las brechas identificadas impactan directamente en la disponibilidad de especialistas, la continuidad de los servicios y la capacidad de los sistemas de salud para responder a las necesidades de la población, en particular en el primer nivel de atención.

    “La región no podrá avanzar hacia sistemas de salud más equitativos si no se abordan las brechas en disponibilidad, distribución y condiciones laborales del personal de salud”, dijo el doctor Jarbas Barbosa, Director de la OPS. “Este informe ofrece evidencia clave para orientar decisiones de política pública a fin de fortalecer la capacidad de los sistemas de salud para responder de manera oportuna y equitativa”, añadió. 

    El análisis identifica desafíos comunes en los nueve países, entre ellos el pluriempleo creciente, la migración del personal sanitario, la concentración en las áreas urbanas, la desalineación entre la oferta educativa y las necesidades de los sistemas de salud, y las marcadas diferencias en las condiciones laborales entre sectores y territorios. 

    Las densidades de recursos humanos para la salud varían ampliamente entre países, desde menos de 40 profesionales por cada 10.000 habitantes en algunos contextos hasta cerca de 118 en otros, lo que refleja las asimetrías regionales.

    Entre los principales hallazgos por país, el informe destaca que:

    • Argentina presenta una fuerte concentración de médicos en Buenos Aires, brechas crecientes en residencias y pluriempleo significativo.
    • Bolivia concentra el 73% del personal en tres departamentos y enfrenta dificultades persistentes para retener profesionales en zonas rurales.
    • Brasil muestra grandes desigualdades entre regiones, con menor disponibilidad en el norte y nordeste, y alta proporción de contratos múltiples.
    • Chile registra déficit de especialistas y dificultades para cubrir vacantes en zonas extremas.
    • Colombia presenta brechas territoriales marcadas, necesidad de fortalecer equipos básicos y una oferta educativa concentrada en grandes ciudades.
    • Ecuador enfrenta alta rotación en zonas remotas y concentración del personal en Quito, Guayaquil y Cuenca.
    • Paraguay mantiene vacantes sin cubrir en el sector público y baja formación en medicina familiar.
    • Perú concentra el 85% del personal en zonas urbanas y presenta un déficit estimado de más de 54.000 trabajadores de salud.
    • Uruguay registra alta concentración en Montevideo y diferencias salariales entre sectores.

    “Los países necesitan sistemas de información más sólidos y políticas integrales que aborden simultáneamente la formación, contratación, distribución y retención del personal de salud”, señaló James Fitzgerald, Director de Sistemas y Servicios de Salud de la OPS.

    La OPS insta a los gobiernos de la región a invertir en la formación y retención del personal de salud, mejorar las condiciones laborales y fortalecer la planificación del personal sanitario, con especial atención al primer nivel de atención y a las zonas con mayores necesidades.

    El informe también subraya la importancia de coordinar acciones entre los sectores de salud, educación y finanzas, así como de promover políticas de migración ética que protejan tanto a los trabajadores de la salud como a los sistemas sanitarios. 

    A cinco años del cumplimiento de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS), la OPS reafirma que colocar al personal de salud en el centro de las decisiones de política pública es clave para avanzar hacia la cobertura universal de salud.

  • Nuevo acuerdo impulsa la tokenización masiva de acciones en Wall Street

    Securitize, plataforma de tokenización respaldada por BlackRock; y Computershare, el mayor agente de transferencia de valores del mundo, anunciaron el 29 de abril un acuerdo para que empresas cotizadas en EE. UU. puedan emitir versiones tokenizadas de sus acciones junto a los títulos tradicionales.

    El mecanismo central para este proceso de tokenización son los denominados Issuer-Sponsored Tokens (IST), instrumentos que, según Securitize, representan propiedad accionaria directa y no derivados financieros ni estructuras intermediarias. A diferencia de otros instrumentos sintéticos, los IST se caracterizan por no ser derivados financieros ni estructuras complejas, sino un reflejo directo del activo.

    En consecuencia, los IST representan la propiedad accionaria directa del activo subyacente, lo que significa que el titular del token es dueño de una parte del activo real.

    Sobre ello, Carlos Domingo, CEO de Securitize, sostiene que estos instrumentos «proporcionan a los emisores estadounidenses la capacidad de crear propiedad de capital directo en forma de token», sin alterar la estructura de capital existente, ni salirse del marco regulatorio vigente.

    Ann Bowering, CEO de Computershare Issuer Services North America, agregó que el enfoque del acuerdo es «empoderar a las empresas cotizadas en EE.UU. para emitir acciones tokenizadas manteniendo el control sobre su base accionaria», un requisito que la firma identifica como condición no negociable para las compañías públicas.

    La idea es que Computershare, una de las mayores firmas de servicios financieros del mundo, actúe actualmente como agente de transferencia (transfer agent) de aproximadamente el 58% de las empresas que integran el S&P 500.Esto significa que será la encargada de registrar oficialmente quiénes son los dueños de las acciones, gestionar los cambios de propiedad, emitir certificados y llevar el libro de accionistas de esas compañías.

    En este punto son claves los mecanismos que se implementarán para el cumplimiento, pues determinarán si estos instrumentos cumplen o no con los lineamientos trazados por la Comisión de Bolsa y valores de EE. UU. (SEC). El organismo dejó claro en enero de 2026 que tokenizar una acción no cambia su tratamiento regulatorio porque los requisitos de registro bajo la Ley de Valores aplican sin importar el formato.

    En ese sentido, el regulador también advirtió que los productos que ofrezcan exposición sintética, sin conferir derechos de propiedad o voto, quedarán sujetos a restricciones adicionales, limitando su distribución a inversores minoristas. Por tanto, el modelo de IST de Securitize, al operar con respaldo directo del emisor, está diseñado para evitar precisamente esas restricciones.

    La tokenización es capa adicional, no reemplazo

    El acuerdo no obliga a ninguna empresa a tokenizar sus acciones. Cada emisor debe decidir de forma individual si incorpora los IST a su capital emitido. Currenc Group, empresa cotizada en el Nasdaq, ya recurrió a Securitize para tokenizar sus títulos, abriendo opciones como negociación continua, propiedad fraccionada y uso en protocolos de finanzas descentralizadas.

    Securitize, respaldada por BlackRock y con más de 4.000 millones de dólares en activos tokenizados bajo gestión, tiene acuerdos vigentes con la Bolsa de Nueva York para el desarrollo de una plataforma de valores tokenizados. También con gestoras como Apollo, KKR y VanEck. La firma plantea que este acuerdo «abre la puerta a millones de inversores para mantener sus acciones en forma tokenizada».

    Domingo sostiene que el modelo de ISTs evita el principal problema estructural de los productos tokenizados existentes: que los tokens representen reclamaciones sobre acciones y no las acciones mismas. Esa distinción, según la firma, es lo que permite operar dentro de los marcos regulatorios de EE.UU. sin requerir aprobaciones adicionales.

    Securitize acumula acuerdos con la NYSE, BlackRock y ahora Computershare, consolidando su posición como el operador con mayor alcance institucional en la tokenización de acciones en EE.UU. La pregunta que queda abierta no es si la infraestructura existe, sino cuántas empresas del S&P 500 decidirán usarla.

  • Luis Díaz: Carragher se atragantó con sus críticas y ahora extraña al jugador Colombiano

    Se dice que siempre es bueno resaltar las cosas buenas y, aunque para muchos solo es “suerte”, hoy Luis Díaz es portada en Europa, algo que para el jugador es el resultado de confianza y esfuerzo de muchos años de trabajo. Fue la figura del partidazo entre PSG y Bayern en Champions y mantuvo vivos a los alemanes en la serie.

    De verdugo a arrepentido: Carragher se come sus dardos contra Lucho Díaz

    Jamie Carragher, muy reconocido por ser crítico feroz del colombiano en su etapa Premier, tuvo que tragarse sus palabras. El exjugador del Liverpool, ahora analista, se cansó de decir que Díaz no era top. Que no defendía. Que no era Firmino, ni Mané, ni Salah. Fue, sin lugar a dudas, una cachetada a sus comentarios contra Díaz.

    Luis Diaz, figura contra el Hoffenheim Foto:AFP

    “Díaz fue un buen jugador para el Liverpool, pero no fue excelente. El Liverpool le sacó provecho y consiguió un buen precio de venta; fue un buen negocio”, dijo en diciembre en el podcast The Overlap Fan Debate. Y remató: “Tendrá buena pinta ahora con su rendimiento en la Bundesliga, porque es un torneo que no es tan bueno como la Premier League”. 

    El negocio, sin ningún contratiempo, cerró. Liverpool facturó en un mercado de locos de casi 500 millones de euros. Pero perdió algo que no se compra: sacrificio, análisis de juego, constancia, ida y vuelta. Eso que hoy les falta a los ‘reds’ en plena crisis, pese al gasto. Slot tiene “mucho cacique y poco indio”. Y el indio era Díaz. Negocio que dio mucho de qué hablar entre los internautas.

    Bayern Munich’s (Photo by Alexandra BEIER / AFP) Foto:AFP

    Es bueno que recordemos algo que se ha dicho del jugador colombiano: “Luis Díaz nunca fue el jugador perfecto para ser vendido en verano, algo que todavía me resulta difícil y frustrante encontrar una razón para dejarlo ir”, dijo. El mismo que celebraba el ‘cabezazo’ financiero.

    “Jugadores así son difíciles de reemplazar. Nunca te cansarás de ver 90 minutos con Díaz involucrado… nunca pensé que lo vería con otra camiseta”, cerró con nostalgia.

    Más noticias de DEPORTES